|
Science or Intellectual
Fraud?
Research for Online Investors
by John Dalt
7/14/09
John Holdren is Oh! Bama’s Science Czar, he has a distinguished
bio, all the scarier. John Heinz would roll over in
his grave that his money is used to fund extremists such as Mr.
Holdren with an endowed chair at Harvard. Shame on
Harvard. He
has been referred to as Oh! Bama’s Dr.
Strangelove.
In a 1977 book, he co-authored titled “Eco Science” Holdren
offered his view on population control. He advocated forced abortions,
forced sterilization, birth control administered through the
public water supply, and an international police force allowed
to operate inside the U.S. You can watch his presentation
on climate
change.
Oh! Bama said, “"...the truth
is that promoting science isn’t just about providing
resources—it’s about protecting free and open inquiry. It’s
about ensuring that facts and evidence are never twisted or obscured by
politics or ideology. It’s about listening to what our
scientists have to say, even when it’s inconvenient—especially
when it’s inconvenient. Because the highest purpose of science
is the search for knowledge, truth and a greater understanding of the
world around us. That will be my goal as President of the
United States”
I am reminded of the challenge to global warming advocates by
Michael Crichton, before he died. He asked, “show me the
science.” That seems
like a simple request of a trained scientist. All the great world improvers
point to their favorite symptoms that occur in nature, and
assign responsibility, but why not just “show us the
science.” It would
be good to see it before Oh! Bama and Congress commit this
country to economic disarmament.
CIT is in the news again today with a rumored late night
meeting in Washington to rescue the finance
company. No
official release of news, yet. CIT currently trades at
$1.60 down from a 52-week high of $13.00 CIT hit a low of $1.08
yesterday as bankruptcy news took all the air out of the
room.
Arbitrage with the government involved might be a
dangerous game. They have the ability to
make up new rules, ask bondholders of
Chrysler.
The U.S. Treasury wants Bank of America (BAC) to pay $4 billion
for negotiating a rescue agreement around the Merrill Lynch
deal. It was never
signed or used, but Uncle Sugar thinks they should be paid $4
billion for implied U.S. backing on the $118 billion
acquisition.
Our story last week about Google taking on Mr. Softie is taking
another turn this week. MSFT is fighting
back. They announced
moving their Office software online, including plans for a
‘cloud’ operating system. MSFT has the muscle to block
any upstarts in their business; they just have to do it
profitably. This is
a surprising move, as once the software is online the revenue
stream will be harder to maintain. There has to be a cost for the
user, but how will MSFT collect it?
The precious metals market is concerned over the International
Monetary Fund’s authorization to sell 400 metric tons of
gold. It is unclear
if, or when, this sale will take place. I looked up the IMF
website to understand their gold
positions.
The gold they would sell has been acquired since 1978, after
the collapse of the Bretton Woods agreement. The rest of their gold is held,
and may be repurchased by the member countries that contributed
the gold in the first place. In essence, it belongs to them,
at $35 per ounce, when 85% of the voting members agree to
return the gold to member countries. You can read about it, if
interested. It is
hard to get excited about reading doublespeak.
Who are the ten largest holders of gold reserves in the
World?
Owner
Metric Tons
Share of foreign reserves
1.
U.S.
8133.5
78.3%
2.
Germany
3412.6
69.5%
3.
IMF
3217.3
4.
Italy
2451.8
66.5%
5.
France
2450.7
72.6%
6.
GLD etf
1120.6
7.
China
1054.0
1.8%
8.
Switzerland
1040.1
37.1%
9.
Japan
765.2
2.1%
10.
Netherlands
612.5
61.4%
The top 10 holders control 24,258.3 tonnes of gold, or over 855
million ounces.
Worth over 804 billion, about 15.4% of all the gold ever
mined!
The market worked a little higher today, on low
volume. Goldman
Sachs reported second quarter earnings of $4.58 per share,
expected earnings were $3.48. The market should have rallied
on this good news, it did not. This causes concern for the
next few days as investors struggle.
The information presented in this newsletter is based on
generally available news releases, corporate filings, current
events, interviews and the editor’s opinions. It may
contain errors and you should not make investment decisions
based solely on what you believe you have read
here.
Do your own research, it is your money. If you
lose it, it is your responsibility, not ours or your
grandmothers! The
editor may or may not have a position in any securities
discussed. The
editor may have held a position in a security earlier, or
in the future.
MarketToday Home Page
Back to
Top
|